Climate Emotions: Helpless Or Hopeful?
With the recent IPCC warning that we may have perhaps a dozen years before we encounter severe and irreversible impacts of climate change, it comes as little surprise that a recent survey* in climate communications research indicates 7 in 10 people in the U.S. are concerned about global warming, with a third of them “very worried.” About half of those surveyed have personally experienced its effects in their own lives and believe others in the US are being harmed as well.
As science communicators, we may have had years to consider the catastrophic consequences of global warming. But for those who are just beginning to realize that “this is real, this is now”, what are the psychological impacts?
The same survey* indicated that people are more or less evenly split between feeling helpless and feeling hopeful. I encountered similar attitudes when I recently participated in a focus group with other students at The London School of Economics and Political Science, where we explored the ways we connect with and see ourselves in relationship with nature. It didn’t take long for the conversation to turn to climate change. Participants reported feeling overwhelmed, frightened and uncertain, but at the same time they felt a deep responsibility to future generations and to other species.
The good news is that, as climate communicators, our work is having a clear impact: Yale and George Mason University researchers* found that a significant portion of those who have changed their mind about climate change have done so because they have become more informed and are taking this challenge more seriously. However, we also need to be aware of the different ways individuals may be processing what could be new and frightening information.
So how do we convey the significance and urgency of climate change in a way that will leave our audience hopeful and inspired to act, rather than overwhelmed and discouraged? Fortunately, the behavioral science-based communications resources developed by Frameworks Institute and taught through the National Network for Ocean and Climate Change Interpretation (NNOCCI) provide critical insight.
When we use shared values like “protection” or “responsible management” as the lens through which we approach this topic, we keep the narrative focused on why action matters and help to prime a civic mindset that encourages people to think as citizens. Acting together, we can support community-level solutions that are bigger, bolder, and more meaningful than what any one of us could accomplish alone.
As communicators, we can encourage engagement behaviors that will help our audiences connect with other likeminded people in their community. We can also use specific examples of the impacts we’ve already seen from inspirational environmental movements, both past and present, to help people understand how our actions today can have a lasting impact on generations to come. Starting these values-based, solutions-focused conversations spreads the hope we need for swift and effective climate action in our communities.
More Blog Posts
- A Scientist’s Take On Communication TrainingA Scientist’s Take On Communication Training By Evelyn Beaury, August 27 2019 My lessons learned from NNOCCI’s keys to successful climate change conversations – let’s solve this together! With such a polarizing, politicized, and frightening subject, it’s easy to slide into contentious conversation when talking about climate change. I [READ MORE]
- To Frame Climate Change, Lead with a Researched Value—Not a “Rogue” OneTo Frame Climate Change, Lead with a Researched Value—Not a “Rogue” One January 20 2017 This is the sixth post in a series about framing ocean and climate change. So, you want to motivate the public to take action to address climate and ocean change? One of the most important communications moves you can make is to open with a broad statement [READ MORE]
- Correcting the ‘Non-Debate’ Debate about Framing Climate ChangeCorrecting the ‘Non-Debate’ Debate about Framing Climate Change by Julie Sweetland, June 02 2016 Most people are familiar with the “non-debate” debate between the overwhelming majority of scientists who conclude that fossil fuels are contributing to disruptions to the climate system and the tiny but vocal few who deny it. Now, another “non-debate” [READ MORE]
- The Science of ExtremesThe Science of Extremes by Richelle Tanner, July 13 2021 Extreme is a word that can send a climate communicator directly into the swamp: the word extreme is inherently a bit alarming, and vague enough to warrant a multi-sentence qualification when you use it. Even scientists disagree on what this word means and in which context it is appropriate. [READ MORE]
- National Network for Ocean and Climate Change Interpretation (NNOCCI) Impacts After 5 YearsNational Network for Ocean and Climate Change Interpretation (NNOCCI) Impacts After 5 Years by Sarah-Mae Nelson, MS, CIG/CIT, February 13 2016 Since 2009, the National Network for Ocean and Climate Change Interpretation—better known as NNOCCI—has been a collaborative effort to raise the discourse around climate change and ocean acidification. Led [READ MORE]